Factory inspection forms and corrective follow-up

From actual work to a clear record.

1. Prepare the content

   The owner defines the inspection area and purpose. Review questions against actual hazards; no statutory frequency or required format is inferred from this example.

2. Do the actual work

   Carry out the inspection in the workshop. Clearly record location, findings and needed action; photos or documents are supporting records and do not replace the inspection.

3. Receive a clear response

   Assign an owner and due date, keeping “outstanding” status while unresolved. Hazard handling must follow the site’s actual procedures.

4. Review & follow up

   An accountable person rechecks the outcome and records why it is closed or needs further action. Reporting should show work done, outstanding work and change history.

Sample questions

Record a finding, its owner and the work done to resolve it.

1. Where is the issue?
2. What did you find?
3. Who needs to follow up?
4. Has it been resolved? Done / Outstanding / Not sure
5. What still needs checking?

The employer reviews and adapts the content to its task, language and accountable site owner. This draft is not released for assignment to real workers.

What should the record show?

• Area, inspection date and performing person.
• Actual finding and appropriate supporting record references.
• Accountable owner, due date and outstanding work.
• Recheck date, review notes and corrective action history.

PDF instructions and photo/PDF supporting records have been tested in the local product; they are not available on the public site. OCR, automatic document reading, malware scanning and automatic legal verification are not implemented.

An illustrative scenario

Fictional example: workshop materials obstruct an aisle. The manager assigns an owner and requests a recheck before closing. Uploading a photo or completing a form does not automatically establish that the aisle is safe.